Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Paris Peace Conference (January 18, 1919)

The World at the Dawn of the 20th Century

The Paris Peace Conference: Peace or Imposition?

The Paris Peace Conference (January 18, 1919) gathered to determine the future of the defeated countries after World War I. The official goal was to ensure "permanent peace." However, was it really peace?

In reality, the winners dictated their terms to the losers. 32 countries attended the conference, but the decisions were made by the USA, Britain, France, and Italy. The defeated countries, like Germany and the Ottoman Empire, were not even invited to the table. They only waited to sign the heavy treaties prepared for them.

Paris Peace Conference 18 January 1919
Generated by AI

The New Name of Colonialism: The Mandate System

As a Turkish person, looking at this page of history is painful because the Ottoman Empire was being dismantled. The Allied Powers wanted to bypass President Wilson’s principle that said, "Colonialism is forbidden." So, they invented a new system called the "Mandate System."

The Result: They claimed that nations in the Middle East could not govern themselves. Therefore, Ottoman territories like Iraq, Syria, Palestine, and the Arabian Peninsula were placed under the "protection" (control) of Britain and France.

Eastern Anatolia: The idea of establishing an Armenian State in Eastern Anatolia was also officially decided here for the first time.

Discussing Middle East and İzmir.
Generated by AI

The Biggest Betrayal at the Table: İzmir

One of the most critical decisions of the conference was about İzmir. Before the war, İzmir was promised to Italy through secret agreements. However, Britain (Lloyd George) changed the plan at the last minute.

Britain did not want a strong Italy in the Mediterranean. Instead, they preferred a weaker Greece that they could control easily. Consequently, İzmir was given to Greece.

This historical decision created a foundation for the tensions we see today. The militarization of the Aegean islands and the political conflicts between Greece and Türkiye are the long-term results of this decision made in Paris.

Tension between Italy and UK to colonize İzmir.
Generated by AI

The US Withdrawal and the Monroe Doctrine

While the European powers were sharing the Ottoman lands (especially oil regions and the Straits), the USA felt disappointed. President Wilson saw that his principles for a "fair world" were ignored by the European leaders.

As a result, the USA suspended its relations with Europe. They returned to the Monroe Doctrine (Policy of Isolation) and withdrew from European politics. The stage was left to Britain and France until World War II.

Historical Note: Peace Treaties After WWI

Country

Treaty Name

Date

Germany

Treaty of Versailles

June 28, 1919

Austria

Treaty of Saint-Germain

September 10, 1919

Bulgaria

Treaty of Neuilly

November 27, 1919

Hungary

Treaty of Trianon

June 4, 1920

Ottoman Empire

Treaty of Sèvres

August 10, 1920

(Note: The Treaty of Sèvres was never fully implemented thanks to the Turkish War of Independence.)


USA leaves the Conference. 
Generated by AI

In this series, my goal is to give you a clear idea about historical turning points in 500-750 words. In the next blog, we will turn our route to the north. We will discuss the rise of a new power: The Establishment of the Soviet Union and the Bolshevik Revolution.

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Don't Forget the Poor: Pope Francis Part III (Last)

After the first day, the cardinal electors returned to Santa Marta on a rainy afternoon. The first ballot showed the division among the Italian blocs and that Scola had not received the expected support. This was a strong sign that a candidate from Latin America might come forward. Bergoglio’s name was now being taken seriously, and the number of his supporters was skyrocketing. His pastoral and simple lifestyle drew attention. That first evening had already begun to shape the future papal candidate within the dramatic balance of the conclave.

By the first night of the conclave, three strong factors in Bergoglio’s favour had become clear: the full support of the Latin American cardinals, his short but inspiring speech, and the backing of several cardinals from Asia, Africa, and parts of Europe. In addition, experienced cardinals who had known him from the 2005 conclave were also behind him. For the undecided electors, that night was the time to make up their minds for the vote the next morning. Bergoglio’s future would be decided the following day.

Before the conclave, the media was speculating about cracks in Scola’s Italian support and about the situation of other leading candidates. Bergoglio, meanwhile, was now on the radar of many cardinals. It was true that his age caused some concern, but his experience and vision outweighed those doubts.

From an African perspective, the new pope had to care not only for Catholics but for the concerns of the entire world. Bergoglio’s pastoral approach and openness to dialogue made him a fitting candidate for this global responsibility. The conclave was not just about choosing a pope; it was a decision that would shape the Church’s role across the whole world.In the morning, the cardinals arrived at the Sistine Chapel and began the second ballot. The second and third votes saw Bergoglio quickly rise to the forefront; while Scola’s support stalled, Ouellet began to fall behind. The cardinals listened to the ballots in silence, each name echoing like a turning point in history. Once again, black smoke rose into the air, thousands outside were still waiting for the new pope. The dynamics of the conclave were now clear: for the first time, history was pointing toward a pope from the New World. Even though Scola continued to resist, Bergoglio’s rise seemed unstoppable.

During lunch at Santa Marta, tension and anticipation were at their peak. The crowd outside had a growing sense that Bergoglio would be chosen, and the cardinals inside were aware of this shift as well. Bergoglio himself did not yet fully believe he would be elected, but there were signs preparing him for the possibility: the Cuban cardinal Ortega y Alamino had asked for his speech text and, when announcing it, said, “Now I have the text of the new pope.” The Chilean cardinal Ossa warned him, “Be ready for what you will say!” while Maradiaga invited him to lunch. All these hints showed that Bergoglio was moving toward a historic election in the coming hours.

During lunch, the last rumours attempting to block his path spread: some were claiming he had only one lung to weaken his chances. However, his supporters, especially Cardinal Maradiaga, turned to Bergoglio to verify his health condition and learned the truth. These clarifications brought great relief to Bergoglio and those around him. At that moment, through the signs and the reactions of the cardinals near him, Bergoglio began to feel that he would indeed be elected. In his own words, he felt “a deep peace and calm, even though it was a complete surprise.” That peace carried over into his short rest after lunch, reflecting his calm, determined, and faith-filled character. Meanwhile, other cardinals were also making their preparations for the election: For example, Cardinal Tong had brought a special gift to present to the new pope.

Pope Francis enters the Domus Sanctae Marthae

In the morning, the cardinals arrived at the Sistine Chapel and began the second ballot. The second and third votes saw Bergoglio quickly rise to the forefront; while Scola’s support stalled, Ouellet began to fall behind. The cardinals listened to the ballots in silence, each name echoing like a turning point in history. Once again, black smoke rose into the air; thousands outside were still waiting for the new pope. The dynamics of the conclave were now clear: for the first time, history was pointing toward a pope from the New World. Even though Scola continued to resist, Bergoglio’s rise seemed unstoppable.

During lunch at Santa Marta, tension and anticipation were at their peak. The crowd outside had a growing sense that Bergoglio would be chosen, and the cardinals inside were aware of this shift as well. Bergoglio himself did not yet fully believe he would be elected, but there were signs preparing him for the possibility: the Cuban cardinal Ortega y Alamino had asked for his speech text and, when announcing it, said, “Now I have the text of the new pope.” The Chilean cardinal Ossa warned him, “Be ready for what you will say!” while Maradiaga invited him to lunch. All these hints showed that Bergoglio was moving toward a historic election in the coming hours.

During lunch, the last rumours attempting to block his path spread: some claimed he had only one lung, which would weaken his chances. However, his supporters, especially Cardinal Maradiaga, turned to Bergoglio to verify his health condition and learned the truth. These clarifications brought great relief to Bergoglio and those around him. At that moment, through the signs and the reactions of the cardinals near him, Bergoglio began to feel that he would indeed be elected. In his own words, he felt “a deep peace and calm, even though it was a complete surprise.” That peace carried over into his short rest after lunch, reflecting his calm, determined, and faith-filled character. Meanwhile, other cardinals were also making their preparations for the election: For example, Cardinal Tong had brought a special gift to present to the new pope.

Apostolic Palace
A view of the palace from Saint Peter's Square

When the cardinals entered the fourth ballot, Bergoglio was in the lead with 67 votes, followed by Scola with 32 and Ouellet with 13. As a surprise name, Agostino Vallini received two votes, but this last-minute move could not stop Bergoglio’s advance.

In the fifth ballot, one cardinal accidentally glued two ballots together, making the total 116 instead of 115, and the result was declared invalid. However, everything returned to normal in the sixth ballot, and Bergoglio surpassed the required 77 votes, winning with 85. The excitement reflected in the Cardinals’ faces, their silence, and their prayers revealed the sacredness of this historic moment.

Elected as the first Latin American and the first Jesuit pope, Bergoglio embraced Scola right after the vote; history had been made. The joy inside and the cheers outside merged; people from all over the world were eager to greet their new pope.

When asked about his election, Bergoglio said in Latin: “I am a great sinner, trusting in the mercy of God, I accept in suffering.” 

Then he announced his papal name: Francesco. This name, honouring Saint Francis of Assisi, symbolized the ideals of poverty, peace, and care for creation.

The rituals continued: the master of ceremonies prepared the documents, and Bergoglio removed his cardinal robes and changed into the white cassock. Yet he did not follow every tradition; he refused the golden cross and red shoes, chose not to wear the mozzetta, and kept his own black shoes instead. Cardinals Sandri and Gracias watched his calm and steady steps; Francis, dressed in white, walked into the room and into history.

This moment was more than just an election; through his choice and his name, the new pope sent a message to the world: the Church would stand with the poor and defend peace and justice.

At 8:12 p.m., Cardinal Tauran gave the joyful news to the world in Latin: “Annuntio vobis gaudium magnum, habemus papam!” (I announce to you a great joy, we have a pope!)

Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Pope Francis.

The square and millions watching around the world erupted in emotion: applause, tears, and a social media storm under the hashtag #HabemusPapam.

While people in Argentina overflowed with joy, the Italian media was stunned everyone had expected Scola, yet Francis was the surprise.
With his very first words, “Fratelli e sorelle, buona sera!” (Brothers and sisters, good evening!), he instantly won hearts. He introduced himself simply as “the bishop,” not with grand titles, and unlike his predecessors, he invited the people to pray with him. When giving the blessing, he remained humble, asking the crowd to pray for him first.

He soon called Benedict XVI to speak with him by phone; then, as he returned to Santa Marta, he declined the limousine and instead took the bus with the other cardinals. He thanked them all and, with his usual touch of humour, said, “May God forgive you.”

Up to this point, we have seen the story as an overview. Now, we will read to this journey again through the late pope’s own words, from his book.

Then, on the day of my election, March 13, after spending the morning in the Sistine Chapel for the votes, I received three very clear signals.I should explain that we were all sleeping at the Domus Sanctae Marthae, St. Martha’s House, during the days of the conclave, in order to avoid any contact with the outside world. We all went back there for lunch, and before the meal I went up to the fifth floor, to the room of Cardinal Jaime Ortega y Alamino, archbishop of Havana, who had asked me for a copy of the speech I made during the general congregation. I took him the transcript, apologizing because it was handwritten and telling him I didn’t have any photocopies. And he said to me, “Ah, how wonderful. I’m taking home a souvenir of the new pope.” And this was the first signal, but I didn’t understand that yet. I took the elevator down to my own floor, the second, but at the fourth it stopped and Cardinal Francisco Errázuriz, archbishop emeritus of Santiago, came in. I had known him since my Aparecida days.

“Have you prepared your speech?” he asked.

“What speech?” I replied, intrigued.

“Today’s—the one you’ll have to make when you appear on the central loggia of the basilica,” was his answer.And that was the second signal, but I didn’t understand this time either.
I went down to lunch and entered the room with Cardinal Leonardo Sandri. A few European cardinals who were already in the room said to me, “Come, Your Eminence, come over here and tell us about Latin America.” I thought nothing of it and accepted their invitation, but they gave me a thorough grilling. At the end of the meal, as I was leaving, Cardinal Santos Abril y Castelló, whom I had known well when he was the papal nuncio in Argentina, came up to me.

He asked, “Forgive the question, Your Eminence, but is it true that you are missing a lung?”

“No, it’s not true,” I replied. “Only the upper lobe of my right lung is missing.”

“When did this happen?” he continued.

“In 1957, when I was twenty-one,”

I told him. He looked serious and remarked, in a somewhat irritated tone, “These last-minute moves!” And that was the precise moment I realized the cardinals were thinking about me as a successor to Pope Benedict XVI. That afternoon we went back into conclave. I found the Italian cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi in front of the Sistine Chapel, and we stopped to talk because during my studies I had always used his editions of the sapiential, or poetic, books of the Bible, particularly the book of Job.

I was nearly elected on the first ballot, and at that stage the Brazilian cardinal Cláudio Hummes approached me and said, “Don’t be afraid! This is how the Holy Spirit works.” And then, on the third ballot of the afternoon, when the seventy-seventh vote was counted and my name had received two-thirds of the electors’ votes, everyone applauded for a long time. While the ballot papers were being scrutinized, Hummes came over to me again, kissed me, and said the words that have stayed in my heart and mind ever since: “Don’t forget the poor.”

PART 1: In Bergoglio’s Shadow: The Conclave After Ratzinger

PART 2: Bergoglio's Rising: Conclave is starting (2013) Part II

Reference

  • O’Connell, Gerard. The Election of Pope Francis: An Inside Account of the Conclave That Changed History. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2019
  • Pope Francis. Life: My Story Through History―An Autobiography of the Life and Legacy of Pope Francis. Thomas Nelson, 2022.

Thursday, August 14, 2025

Bergoglio's Rising: Conclave is starting (2013) Part II

Extra Omnes

That morning, after passing through security, Bergoglio left his suitcase and went to his room, which, as determined by lottery, was room 207 in Santa Marta.

This morning at 10:00, over 150 cardinals, both electors and those above eighty, processed into St. Peter’s Basilica for a solemn Latin Mass attended by around 7,000 people, including clergy, religious, lay faithful, diplomats, and global media. Thunder rolled outside as heavy rain fell. Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI followed the event from Castel Gandolfo. When the Mass ended, the cardinals processed out amid camera flashes, the faithful quietly wondering who among them would be the next pope. In the sacristy, after vestments were removed, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia approached Bergoglio with a sudden remark: “You could be the next pope!”

The historical record offers some perspective on the length of the conclave. It shows that eight conclaves were held over the past hundred years, and most were short. The longest was for the election of Pius XI in 1922, which took fourteen votes. The most rapid came on the eve of World War II in 1939, when Pius XII was elected in three ballots. Since then, John XXIII was elected in 1958 after eleven ballots, Paul VI in 1963 after five ballots, John Paul I after four and John Paul II after eight—both in 1978—and Benedict XVI in 2005 after four. This would suggest that the 2013 conclave could also be short, but cardinals seemed unsure about this as they began...

O’Connell, Gerard. The Election of Pope Francis: An Inside Account of the Conclave That Changed History. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2019.

In Le Monde, Stephanie Le Bars wrote about ten cardinals who could become pope: Ravasi, Scola, Schönborn, Ouellet, Scherer, Sarah, Tagle, Ranjith, O'Malley and Erdo. 

With minutes to go before the conclave began, the windows of the cardinals' rooms in Santa Marta were tightly locked and the blinds closed. All contact with the outside world was cut off; those inside would now shoulder the burden of their sacred duty alone. Here, in the heart of the Vatican, a sacred silence reigned. The cardinals, electors, and everyone involved in the conclave process were completely cut off from communication. Security was as impenetrable as an iron wall, protecting both Santa Marta and all the paths leading from there to the Sistine Chapel. At lunchtime, the electors gathered in groups in the dining hall. Those experiencing the conclave for the first time were amazed by the uniqueness of the environment.

Today's conclave will take place in the Sistine Chapel, famous for its historic atmosphere. However, when we look back at history, we see that popes were not always elected in this sacred place. Over the centuries, popes were elected in different places and by different methods. For example, in 731, Pope Gregory III was elected by ‘acclamation,’ that is, by the enthusiastic approval of the people. In 1585, Sixtus V ascended to the papacy ‘almost by inspiration,’ that is, through a special spiritual sign. However, in general, popes are elected by secret ballot. The first papal election by secret ballot took place in 1276 in Arezzo, 135 miles north of Rome. Since then, almost all papal elections have been conducted by conclave since 1294. The election held in 2013 will be the 75th conclave. Almost all papal elections have been held in Italy, mostly in Rome. Fifty-one conclaves took place in the Vatican, and 24 of these were held in the historic Sistine Chapel. Additionally, ten elections between 1550 and 1700 were held in the Pauline Chapel in the Vatican. Thus, this election will be the 52nd conclave in the Vatican and the 25th conclave in the Sistine Chapel. A new chapter is about to be opened in the depths of history.

These electors came from 48 different countries and five continents. There were 60 cardinals from Europe, 28 of whom were Italian. There were 19 from Latin America, 14 from North America (11 from the United States and 3 from Canada), 11 from Africa, 10 from Asia, and only 1 from Oceania (Australia) participating in this historic vote.

Additionally, 18 were members of religious communities and apostolic life communities who had dedicated their lives to God. Among them were one Jesuit, three Little Brothers of St. Francis, one Capuchin Franciscan, four Salesians, two Dominicans, one Redemptorist, one Lazarist, one Sulpician, one Oblate of Mary Immaculate, one Scalabrinian, one Schönstatt Institute priest, and one Mariamite Maronite.

Long tables at the Sistine Chapel await thearrival of cardinals for the conclave to elect the next pope, Tuesday, May 6,2025. | Credit: Vatican Media

The cardinal electors, dressed in red robes, were preparing to be taken from Santa Marta to the Pauline Chapel. The Pauline Chapel was built by Pope Paul IV Farnese between 1537 and 1540. It was located at the top of the Scala Regia, or Royal Staircase, designed by Bernini, which connected the Vatican Palace to St. Peter's Basilica. When they arrived at the chapel, the cardinals gathered together and waited for the ceremony to begin, admiring Michelangelo's two magnificent works on the walls: ‘The Conversion of Saint Paul’ and ‘The Crucifixion of Saint Peter.’ These works were commissioned by Paul III and created after Michelangelo completed ‘The Last Judgment’ in the Sistine Chapel.

By now, most of the cardinals had decided who to give their first vote to. Many also had second and even third choices in mind, as they would need to turn to alternatives if their first candidate failed to gain support. However, as in the past, those who were undecided would typically cast their first vote for a name they admired, respected, or wished to encourage. The announcement that divided their thoughts signalled the start of the ceremony. This ceremony, rich in history, ritual, and pomp, began at 4:30 PM with a grand ceremony at the Pauline Chapel, accompanied by prayers. In accordance with the Ordo Rituum Conclavis, a brief address was given by the cardinal.

Then the cardinals slowly walked towards the Sistine Chapel. At the front of the procession was the cross, followed by the Sistine choir, then two ceremonial officers, two sacristans, and the cardinal dean's religious assistant. Next came the Secretary of the College of Cardinals, Archbishop Baldisseri; Cardinal Grech, who would lead the meditation; and the cardinal electors. They were arranged in hierarchical order and by age: first the cardinal deacons, then the cardinal bishops, and finally the cardinal archbishops. A deacon followed them, carrying the Book of the Gospel.

During the procession, the famous Sistine Chapel Choir guided the cardinals with Latin hymns. They first sang the Litany of the Saints, calling upon the intercession of all the saints. Then rose the Veni Creator, a hymn from the 9th century, asking for the guidance of the Holy Spirit. This was the moment for the cardinal electors to prepare themselves for the monumental decision they were about to make ,for the universal Church and the world.

They entered the Sistine Chapel in pairs. Walking to the center, they paid homage to the crucifix before taking their predetermined seats along the chapel’s two sides.

Many cardinals, especially those seeing it for the first time, gazed with awe and reverence at the stunning frescoes adorning the chapel walls. These masterpieces were commissioned by Pope Sixtus IV and painted by renowned Renaissance artists such as Botticelli, Perugino, Pinturicchio, Ghirlandaio, and Rosselli. The frescoes depicted scenes from the lives of Moses and Jesus. Completed in 1482, Sixtus IV celebrated the chapel’s first Mass there on August 15, 1483. The very first conclave held in the Sistine Chapel took place in 1513. As the cardinals took their places, their eyes were drawn upward to the magnificent ceiling, the work of Michelangelo, one of the greatest masters of the Italian Renaissance. It was filled with scenes from the Book of Genesis. The most famous of these is the image of God reaching out to touch Adam’s finger during Creation, painted between 1508 and 1512 under the patronage of Pope Julius II.

In front of every cardinal in the Sistine Chapel were three important texts: the apostolic constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, which governs the papal election process; the Ordo Rituum, detailing the conclave rituals; and the Liturgy of the Hours prayer book. Additionally, a list containing the names of all cardinal electors was placed before them. After all cardinals took their seats, the conclave’s presiding officer, Cardinal Re, read aloud the oath pledging to follow all the rules of the papal election and to keep complete secrecy about everything that happened during the conclave. This oath forbade leaking any information about the election, prohibited any audio or video recordings, and barred any outside interference in the process. Breaking the oath carried an automatic penalty of excommunication.

Following the cardinal dean’s reading of the oath, each cardinal, in order of hierarchy, went to the open Bible placed in the center of the Sistine Chapel and repeated the oath personally, placing his hand on the book. This entire process was broadcast live by Vatican Television.

Once the oaths were completed, Monsignor Marini, the ceremony’s master, loudly commanded, “Extra omnes!” (“Everyone out!”). Millions around the world watched this thrilling moment. Except for those who were not allowed to vote, Monsignor Marini, and Cardinal Prosper Stanley Grech, everyone else left the chapel immediately. Marini then slowly closed the two massive wooden doors of the Sistine Chapel. Outside the doors, two Swiss Guards stood firmly, dressed in their colorful uniforms and holding long halberds, allowing no one to enter.

The Two Popes

All 115 cardinal electors wrote the name of their chosen candidate on their ballots, carefully folded them, and then proceeded one by one to the podium to cast their votes in order. Each cardinal held their ballot between their thumb and index finger, raised it clearly so everyone could see, and then walked towards the altar where a silver and gold-plated urn decorated with the figure of the Good Shepherd awaited. This urn was crafted by the Italian sculptor Cecco Bonanotte.

Upon reaching the altar, beneath the breathtaking sight of Michelangelo’s Last Judgment, each cardinal loudly and clearly proclaimed the oath:
“I cast my vote for the one whom I believe to be worthy before God.”

Afterwards, they placed their ballot on the gold-plated plate atop the altar, tilted it gently to allow the ballot to fall into the urn, and finally paid their respects to the crucifix before returning to their seat. The next cardinal then repeated the same ritual.

Once all 115 electors had cast their votes, three officials approached the podium to begin the count. The tension was palpable; everyone held their breath for this historic moment. The first official shook the urn to mix the ballots, using the same urn from the previous conclave. Then, the second official took each ballot and transferred it to a second, empty urn. This step verified that the number of ballots matched the number of electors if there was any discrepancy, that round would be declared invalid.

When the count was complete, the three officials sat at the table in front of the altar. The first opened each ballot, quietly read the candidate’s name, and took note. The second repeated the process, and the third announced the name aloud to the entire assembly before recording it on a specially prepared sheet of paper. From the outside, the windows of the Sistine Chapel were completely darkened. However, given advances in modern communication technology and risks of electronic eavesdropping, the security measures from the 2005 conclave were deemed insufficient. For the 2013 conclave, additional precautions were introduced, including Faraday cages and other cutting-edge devices designed to block smartphone signals and prevent electronic surveillance.

To secure the votes, the third official pierced the word “Eligo” (“I elect”) on each ballot with a needle and thread, binding the ballots together. Once all were read, knots were tied at the ends of the threads, and the linked ballots were set aside.

The Two Popes

The third and final phase of the voting, the counting of the ballots, had begun. The results brought many surprising moments. Before the conclave, many cardinals had expected a wide distribution of votes in the first ballot, but no one anticipated just how broad it would be: a total of twenty-three cardinals received at least one vote, meaning one in every five cardinals was supported. Moreover, four of them received ten or more votes, while another received four votes.

Cardinal Scola led with thirty votes, though he did not receive as many as some cardinals and the Italian media had predicted. The biggest surprise was Cardinal Bergoglio from Argentina, who came in a close second with twenty-six votes. In fact, he should have had twenty-seven, but one ballot mistakenly recorded his name as “Broglio.” This was an extremely promising start for the Archbishop of Buenos Aires.

Coming in third was Ouellet, who performed better than expected, garnering twenty-two votes and establishing himself as a strong candidate. O’Malley was a surprise with ten votes, marking the highest number ever received by an American candidate. On the other hand, the highly promising Brazilian Cardinal Scherer received only four votes, which was unexpectedly low. Outside these frontrunners, five cardinals, Schönborn, Turkson, Pell, Monsengwo Pasinya, and Dolan, each received two votes. Another thirteen cardinals garnered a single vote each, including the misspelt “Broglio,” which was clearly meant for Bergoglio.

The voting process concluded with the burning of the ballots. After double-checking the count reports, officials took the ballots and records to one of two specially prepared ovens in the back left corner of the Sistine Chapel. These two ovens were connected to a narrow chimney that led outside, a symbol watched by the world for centuries to see if a new pope had been elected. This tradition dates back to the 18th century when the master of ceremonies decided to announce the results to the world by the colour of the smoke, black or white, rising from the ballots’ burning. (Following the rules, the ballots from this first vote were burned in the old oven used in every conclave since 1939.)

PART 1: In Bergoglio’s Shadow: The Conclave After Ratzinger

References

·   O’Connell, Gerard. The Election of Pope Francis: An Inside Account of the Conclave That Changed History. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2019.

·      Pope Francis. Life: My Story Through History―An Autobiography of the Life and Legacy of Pope Francis. Thomas Nelson, 2022.