The U-2 Crisis, Cuban Missile Crisis, and Vietnam: Cold War at Its Hottest

On May 16, 1960, it was decided that a Summit Conference would be held in Paris among America, the Soviet Union, Britain, France, and West Germany. However, this conference could not take place. Just shortly before the planned summit, on May 5, 1960, Soviet leader Khrushchev announced that an American U-2 spy plane had been shot down within Soviet borders. This incident, which went down in history as the U-2 Crisis, led to the cancellation of the conference and once again negatively affected the relations between the superpowers.

A Lockheed U-2 in flight

There is a very clear conclusion we must draw from this: In diplomacy, two plus two definitely does not equal four. While peace is discussed at the table, different dynamics always continue to operate in the background. Perhaps such crises experienced in the past have played a massive role in the extensive development of today's modern intelligence networks.

As a result of the space race that emerged between America and the Soviets, America began producing U-2 spy planes to gather intelligence. On May 1, 1960, one of these U-2 planes took off from the İncirlik Base in Adana (Türkiye) and entered Soviet territory, but was shot down by the Soviets as it descended. In fact, when we think about it in the context of intelligence wars, we can say that this and similar incidents are perhaps still continuing today in different forms.

John F. Kennedy (1917–1963) and Nikita Khrushchev (1894–1971) in Vienna, Austria in May 1961

The Cuban Missile Crisis

After Fidel Castro took power in 1959, Cuba’s relations with the Soviets strengthened in the years 1960-1961. Meanwhile, starting in 1962, the Soviets began placing missiles in Cuba without the rest of the world knowing. Look at this: people who wanted to save their own country and its freedom suddenly became almost like puppets of the Soviets, starting to place missiles in their country with the range to strike America. I leave the judgment to you. By the way, do not misunderstand, I am not defending America, but these are the historical facts.

In his speech on October 22, 1962, US President Kennedy announced that the Soviets had secretly placed nuclear missiles on Cuban soil. Upon this, the US Navy took action and blockaded Cuba. This situation brought the two superpowers to the brink of a nuclear war. However, the immense danger such a war would unleash, and the realization by the US and Soviet Russia that they had reached a balance in political and military fields, prevented a hot conflict. In exchange for removing the missiles in Cuba, the Soviets demanded that America remove its Jupiter missiles located in Türkiye. America accepted this proposal, and the crisis subsided. Following this massive crisis, the famous “Red Telephone” hotline was established between Soviet Russia and America on June 20, 1963, specifically to prevent misunderstandings during periods of crisis.

American POWs recently released from North Vietnamese prison camps, 1973

The Vietnam War

For the full background on Vietnam's colonial history and the Indochina War, see our earlier post: The End of Empires: Indian Independence, Vietnam, and the African Awakening

An important symbol of resistance that we probably all know, which has been the subject of movies, and where America failed. Following the end of the Japanese occupation after World War II, a war broke out between communists and nationalists in Vietnam, a former French colony. When France withdrew from Vietnam, with the involvement of the United Nations, the region was divided into North and South, with the 17th parallel accepted as the border. The war began with the communists in the North attacking the South and gained an international dimension with America's intervention. As North Vietnamese troops entered the south, America deployed soldiers to the region; however, this development was seen as baseless and meaningless by the American public, drawing significant backlash.

Following talks in Paris, the Vietnam Peace Accords were signed in January 1973. The political rapprochement of the Soviets and China with America played a significant role in the signing of this treaty. Although the Vietnam War initially seemed likely to improve China-Soviet relations, it actually heightened the power struggle within the communist bloc and caused new disputes during the détente period. Ultimately, America failed in its strategy to keep Vietnam divided, and North and South Vietnam united in 1975 to become the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

The Backdrop of the War and Muhammad Ali's Historic Stance

Historical Retrospective • Special Feature

On the political front of the war, the US began peace talks with North Vietnam in Paris in 1968, and the new US President Richard Nixon decided to withdraw American troops from Vietnam. Interestingly, however, while deciding to withdraw, the US military intensified its attacks in order to force Vietnam to the peace table.

This bloody and seemingly senseless war created massive rifts within American society as well. One of the greatest symbols of this was Muhammad Ali (1942-2016), one of the most famous boxers of all time. Despite being drafted into the Vietnam War, the legendary boxer refused to fight and spoke those historic words etched in memory:

"I ain't got no quarrel with them Viet Cong." (The Viet Cong never did me any wrong that I should fight them.)

Muhammad Ali's honorable and anti-war stance caused him to pay a heavy price. He was stripped of his world championship title, his boxing license was revoked, and he was banned from participating in official matches for 3 years. Enduring all of this and later regaining his license to take the boxing world by storm once again, Muhammad Ali passed away on June 3, 2016.

Balkan Alliance, Baghdad Pact, and the Syrian Crisis: Turkey at the Heart of Cold War Diplomacy

In this new section, we will transition along that strategic line stretching from the Balkans to the Middle East. We will focus on regional developments that affected our country's security and foreign policy, such as the Balkan Alliance, the Baghdad Pact, and the Syrian Crisis. After closing this important file, we will set sail for brand-new topics.

Balkan Alliance

The first critical step in this new phase stretching from the Balkans to the Middle East is the Balkan Alliance, or the Balkan Pact, dated August 9, 1954. This alliance was formed when Yugoslavia, the only communist state outside of Soviet control, came together with Türkiye and Greece, whose entries into NATO were already guaranteed. The main goal was to prevent the USSR from expanding into the Balkans and the Mediterranean.

Member Countries of the Balkan Alliance

The rapprochement among the three countries, which began towards the end of 1951, became official with the “Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation” signed in Ankara on February 28, 1953. Under this agreement, the parties decided to consult each other on matters of common interest and to hold meetings at the foreign minister level at least once a year. As a result of these ongoing meetings, the Bled Agreement was signed on August 9, 1954, transforming the alliance fully into a military pact.

In fact, any attack directed at one of them would be considered an attack against all, and all necessary measures, including military force, would be taken. However, things did not go as smoothly as they appeared on paper. From the very first days, disagreements between Turkey and Yugoslavia emerged, and Yugoslavia's interest in the pact began to wane as it mended its relations with the Soviets after 1955. On top of that, when the Cyprus Issue erupted between Turkey and Greece, the positive atmosphere created by the pact completely faded away. Managing to exist on paper until 1960, the pact officially came to an end and became history in June 1960.

Member Countries of the Baghdad Pact

Another major development that fundamentally shook the balance in the Middle East was the Baghdad Pact, established on February 24, 1955. Seeing the decline of French and British influence in the region, a new alliance idea emerged to prevent Soviet Russia from infiltrating the Middle East. Although this idea originally came from the US, it was Türkiye that put it into action, and the pact was initially signed between Türkiye and Iraq. The pact quickly expanded with the participation of the UK, Pakistan, and Iran, but unfortunately, it failed to create the expected unifying effect in the Arab world.

On the contrary, Arab countries other than Iraq strongly opposed the pact, and the Middle East was literally split into three camps: those who joined, those who strongly opposed it (led by Egypt), and those who remained neutral. Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser, who did not want to lose the leadership of the Middle East to Türkiye and dreamed of uniting the Arab world under his own roof, reacted strongly to this situation. Nasser’s increasing anti-Western sentiment and his rapprochement with the Soviets directly paved the way for the Suez Crisis and ironically made the USSR's job in the region much easier. The real blow that changed the fate of the pact came from Iraq, where the monarchy was overthrown in 1958; the new administration officially announced its withdrawal from the pact on March 24, 1959.

With Iraq’s departure, the headquarters of the organization was immediately moved to Ankara, and its name was changed to CENTO (Central Treaty Organization) on August 18, 1959. In fact, CENTO’s first meeting was held in Washington in October 1959. Although initially established as a military defence alliance, the organization gradually shifted its focus to economic, cultural, and technical cooperation among its members. However, this unity reached the point of collapse when Pakistan and Iran left on March 12, 1979. The very next day, with Türkiye announcing that it respected these withdrawal decisions and that CENTO had effectively lost its function in the region, this alliance, which had marked an era, came to a de facto, if not legal, end.

Syrian scouts on the parade at the year of the crisis

Another major flashpoint in the Middle East was the Syrian Crisis that erupted in 1957. Syria, which had gained its independence from France prior to World War II, was heavily shaken by successive government coups in the 1950s. Amidst this political instability, Syria’s rapprochement with the Soviet Union, driven by Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser, disturbed its neighbours. Particularly, when Syria signed an aid agreement with the USSR in 1956, it was met with fierce backlash from Türkiye, Iraq, Jordan, Israel, and Lebanon. These countries had come to firmly believe that Syria was turning into a mere “Moscow Satellite.” 

The situation grew so tense that US President Eisenhower sent a message to Turkish Prime Minister Adnan Menderes, guaranteeing immediate American weapons aid if Türkiye, Iraq, and Jordan were forced to launch a military operation in response to a potential Syrian attack. Following this assurance, Türkiye’s decision to mass troops on the Syrian border and conduct military exercises brought relations between the two countries to the breaking point.

While the USSR escalated its counter-pressure during this critical period, the region ultimately stepped back from the brink of war. The crisis was gradually resolved thanks to the unwavering support of the US for Türkiye, Saudi Arabia’s mediation between the two nations, and Jordan’s King Hussein softening his stance toward Syria. Another crucial factor in ending the crisis was the historic agreement signed between Syria and Egypt on September 14, 1957. 

The two states decided to form a union under the name of the “United Arab Republic” starting from February 1, 1958. However, this political marriage, which made a massive impact in the Arab world, did not last long; their ties weakened over time, and the union officially ended with a government coup staged by conservative military officers in Syria in 1961.

We are finally putting aside the political maps, the never-ending border conflicts, the secret treaties, and the threats of nuclear war. As we close our Cold War file, we turn our course to perhaps the most fascinating, transformative, and impactful front of this era on our daily lives: Socio-cultural and scientific developments.

The Korean War, the Fall of Indochina, and the Birth of SEATO: Cold War in the Far East

While tensions between the Eastern and Western blocs were shaping Europe, the ripple effects of the Cold War were reaching the Far East as well. Two things deeply concerned both the Soviet Union and China, who were highly influential in the region: the presence of the United States in South Korea, and the continued presence of France in Southeast Asia, in Indochina with active American support. For these reasons, the two defining conflicts in the Far East between 1950 and 1954 were the Korean War and the Indochina War.

Korean War (1950-1953)

Our story actually begins with a dangerous signature placed during the final days of World War II, at the Potsdam Conference in July 1945. When Soviet Russia decided to enter the war in the Far East, to facilitate military operations, the territory of Korea was divided in two right along the 38th parallel, as if drawn with a ruler on a map. The north of this invisible line was recognized as the Soviet military operations zone, while the south was designated for the US.

However, when the war ended, that temporary border turned into a permanent wall. Neither US-Soviet negotiations nor the diplomatic efforts of the United Nations were sufficient to reunite these two regions. As the polarization became definitive, the US organized elections in its controlled south on May 10, 1948, leading to the establishment of the Republic of Korea (South Korea) under the presidency of Syngman Rhee. In response, the Soviets wasted no time in holding elections tailored to their own system in North Korea, establishing the Democratic People's Republic of Korea on September 9, 1948.

The real explosion occurred when the giant of Asia, China, fell under communist rule in 1949. Seizing this massive shift in power, and backed by the Soviets and China, North Korea unexpectedly declared war and crossed the border into South Korea on June 25, 1950, with the aim of completely expelling the US from Asia.

As events reached this breaking point, the UN Security Council convened urgently and took a historic decision: there would be a military intervention in South Korea. An international UN Force, comprising troops from various nations but primarily shouldered and commanded by the US (under General Douglas MacArthur), was formed and deployed to Korea.

Where Turkey Earned Its NATO Ticket: The Epic of Korea

This is exactly where the significance of this war begins for our history. To prove its loyalty to the Western Bloc and secure entry under the NATO umbrella against the Soviet threat, Turkey dispatched a fully equipped military brigade to Korea to serve under this UN Force. This decision marks the very first time in the history of the Turkish Republic that troops were sent abroad, let alone to the other side of the world. The legendary heroism displayed by the Turkish brigade in the Korean mountains resonated tremendously throughout the Western world, throwing the doors of NATO wide open in 1952 for Turkey, whose application had previously been rejected.

This bloody war, which began in 1950 and caused the deaths of millions of civilians and soldiers, ended after three years with neither side able to achieve decisive superiority over the other. With the Panmunjom Armistice signed in July 1953, the guns fell silent, and the border was re-established exactly where the war had started: the 38th parallel. In other words, all that blood failed to shift the borders even a millimeter.

General Walton Walker, Commander of the United Nations Forces, presenting the ‘Silver Star’ medal to Brigadier General Tahsin Yazıcı, Commander of the Turkish Brigade

The Collapse of Colonialism and the Indochina War (1954)

While the waters were calming in Korea, a brand-new storm was brewing in another corner of Asia: Indochina. Emerging from the devastation of World War II, France stubbornly attempted to maintain its colonial rule in this region, which encompassed Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos hoping to return to its former days of glory. However, Asia had awakened; France’s colonial persistence triggered total wars of independence among the regional populations.

France’s inability to crush this resistance and its subsequent entrapment in a quagmire elevated the issue from a local rebellion to a massive Cold War crisis between the Eastern and Western blocs by 1954. As events spiralled out of control, heavyweights such as the US, France, Britain, the USSR, and the People's Republic of China were forced to convene a historic peace conference in Geneva in 1954.

The outcomes of the Geneva Conference were an absolute earthquake in the history of colonialism: suffering a severe defeat, France was forced to withdraw completely from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, and these nations gained their independence. However, the most critical clause of the agreement, and the one that would most significantly impact the future, concerned Vietnam: Just like in Korea, Vietnam was partitioned into two, a (Communist) North and a (pro-Western) South, with the 17th Parallel designated as the border. This division would very soon pave the way to one of the greatest traumas in American history: the Hell of Vietnam.

Indochine physique, 1930

The Establishment of SEATO (Manila Pact) (September 8, 1954)

The crisis in Vietnam, which escalated after the Korean War, pushed the US to reinforce its defence measures in Asia with much firmer and more forceful steps. This war laid bare the danger facing Southeast Asia; the strategic importance of the region had become undeniable. Why was it so significant? If this region were to fall under communist control, Soviet Russia and China could gain dominance over global trade chokepoints like Singapore and the Strait of Malacca, which would create a nightmare scenario for the defence of the Pacific Ocean.

The US Two-Step Strategy

To protect this massive region, the US activated a two-phase plan:

The first step: Directly increasing military and economic aid to countries that had recently gained full independence, such as Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and South Vietnam.

The second step: Establishing a collective defence system to shield the region.

SEATO (Manila Pact) and the Ring of Alliances

The tangible result of the second step was the SEATO (Southeast Asia Treaty Organization), or the Manila Pact, signed on September 8, 1954. This collective defence organization was founded with the participation of global powers like the US, UK, and France, alongside Far Eastern nations: New Zealand, Australia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Pakistan. In doing so, the US created a massive "ring of alliances" surrounding Soviet Russia and its ally, China.

The US did not limit its containment strategy to this alone. To balance the scales in Asia against Communist China, it signed an alliance treaty with the Nationalist Chinese (Formosa/Taiwan) Government on December 2, 1955. Like the SEATO treaty, this alliance had no expiration date; America was determined to transform its borders in Asia into permanent military strongholds.